Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Que2646's column >>

QUE2646

Home Page
Retired science teacher.
Articles Posted: 101  Links Seeded: 87
Member Since: 8/2009  Last Seen: 5/18/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Are Insurers Required to Insure Kids with Preexisting Conditions ?

Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:48 PM EDT
health, obama, kids, healthcare, health-insurance, preexisting-conditions, cherrypicking
By Que2646
Advertise | AdChoices

After a year of wrangling over the Health Care Reform Bill, there are claims that the bill may not cover kids with preexisting conditions until 2014, but that is not so. The Weekly Standard has championed this idea with an article titled Oops Health Care Bill Does not Cover Kids Preexisting Conditions.(1) The language of the Bill was written by the Senate but the focus of the article seems to be to blame President Obama . There seems to be some ambiguity in the way the bill is worded and insurance companies may be trying to use it as a loophole. One might wonder why this is just now being brought up. But, there is more to the story.

The Weekly Standard took its information from an AP news article. It is an example of cherrypicking as the Weekly Standard didn't tell the whole story. The AP news article also goes on to quote HHS spokesman Nick Papas who said: "To ensure that there is no ambiguity on this point, the secretary of HHS is preparing to issue regulations next month making it clear that the term 'pre-existing exclusion' applies to both a child's access to a plan and his or her benefits once he or she is in the plan for all plans newly sold in this country six months from today," (2)

In spite of all the hullabaloo created by the Weekly Standard, the Christian Science Monitor says denial of insurance to kids with preexisting conditions will end this year. They say " Six months from the day the bill was signed (let's see ... that'll be Sept. 23, by our calculation), insurers will no longer be able to exclude children with preexisting conditions from being covered by their family policy. For current policies, that means insurers will have to rescind preexisting-condition exclusions." (3)

The medical information site, WEB-MD has some answers about what reform will mean to consumers: Question: "What provisions begin soon? "Answer: "Starting this year, children up to age 26 would be allowed to remain on their parents' health plan. People with pre-existing medical conditions would be eligible for a new federally funded "high-risk" insurance program. Small businesses could qualify for tax credits of up to 35% of the cost of premiums. Insurance plans would be barred from setting lifetime caps on coverage and would no longer be able to cancel policies when a patient gets sick. Health plans would also be prohibited from excluding pre-existing conditions from coverage for children. "(4)

So there is no "Oops" as the Weekly Standard claims. Kids with preexisting conditions will be able to get insurance coverage this year.

(1) http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/oops-health-care-bill-does-not-cover-kids-pre-existing-conditions
(2)http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jYnajhWrPEXihcCrpRNfUKN7rN-AD9EKTKIG0
(3) http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0324/Health-care-reform-bill-101-rules-for-preexisting-conditions
(4) http://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/news/20100322/faq-how-health-care-reform-will-affect-consumers-employers?ecd=wnl_day_032410

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Que2646's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Republican Progressives
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (5)
Que2646

Haven't kids denied insurance because of preexisting conditions, and their parents, suffered enough without this becoming a political football?

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:59 PM EDT
eriq samson

Seriously, you expect too much from wingnuts

They will say anything, do anything, to show (themselves) that "they are right" no matter how delusional that may be

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:24 PM EDT
Reply
redsfan

So because insurance companies have decided that something in the law isn't written clearly enough and they don't have to abide by it, then the right-wing is agreeing with them? So if I decided that the law isn't clear enough that I have to drive on the right side of the road and start driving on the left side of the road, then it's the lawmaker's fault...not mine? Good grief! These people will do anything to complain about the health care reform bill...even to the point of letting insurance companies decide what part of the bill they feel like following.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:34 PM EDT
The Realist Party

Are Insurers Required to Insure Kids with Preexisting Conditions ?

They damned well better be! If not, feel free to use 100% of my tax dollars to help cover them.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:52 PM EDT
Que2646

Apparently, this has been straightened out:

"After Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius wrote a letter warning insurers against using loopholes to avoid covering children with pre-existing conditions, AHIP President Karen Ignagni wrote back to say insurers will comply with all regulations."

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/ahip-responds-to-sebelius-letter-about-kids-with-pre-existing-conditions.php

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:26 AM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com