Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Que2646's column >>

QUE2646

Home Page
Retired science teacher.
Articles Posted: 101  Links Seeded: 87
Member Since: 8/2009  Last Seen: 5/18/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Live Poll: Help Pick the 2011 Hall of Fame/Shame Awards

Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:28 PM EST
environment, dick-cheney, epa, halliburton, hall-of-fame, forbes, james-hansen, james-taylor, hall-of-shame, tulsa-world, joe-romm, jane-lubchenko, congressman-joe-barton
By Que2646

Live Poll

Hall of Shame

View Results
  • 175335
    Dr. Jane Lubchenco
    13%
  • 175336
    Halliburton (Cheney)
    57%
  • 175337
    Congressman Joe Barton of Texas
    17%
  • 175338
    Forbes Magazine (James Taylor)
    13%

VoteTotal Votes: 30

Live Poll

Hall of Fame

View Results
  • 175339
    Dr. James Hansen
    52%
  • 175340
    The Tulsa World
    14%
  • 175341
    The EPA
    31%
  • 175342
    Joe Romm
    3%

VoteTotal Votes: 29

Advertise | AdChoices

 

<------ Vote for Both Here   -------->

            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nominees:

The four top candidates for each award have been selected from the nominees.Please vote ( twice, once for each category )for the nominees, described below, who you think have most affected the environment through word or deed. If you wish, please post a reason for your vote and a suggestion for other suitable gifts for your favorite candidate. Some great gifts have already been proposed. The author will buy the gifts from his copious blogging earnings, so please don’t worry about the expense.

 

The poll will close on February 28th.

 

 Hall of Shame Nominees:  

Ø     Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Head of NOAA – For using bad data to set fishing catch limits and for not adequately policing BP’s drilling plans or their cleanup operations in the Gulf. Prize: A corexit oil shake.

Ø     Halliburton (Cheney), for the Halliburton clause in the Clean Water Act. It is a loophole in the Clean Water Act that allows the fracking chemicals to remain secret, thanks to Cheney. Prize: A big glass of water from a well next to a hydrofracking operation.

Ø     Congressman Joe Barton of Texas, for his apology to BP about how they were treated after the Gulf Oil spill and for trying to ban energy-efficient light bulbs because they contain mercury, even though he had fought efforts to stop mercury pollution by industries. Prize: A copy of his failing grades on the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard .

Ø     Forbes Magazine (James Taylor) for a ridiculously misleading article, New NASA data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism, that described climate scientists as “alarmist” 15 times. At was classified as news, though it was clearly an opinion article. Award: A copy of the book Ethics And Journalism and a complete ban on ever using the words 'alarmist' again.

Hall of Fame Nominees:

Ø     James Hansen, whose efforts opposing the XL played a pivotal role in delaying a decision and hopefully preventing the construction of the pipeline (see, for example, here, here, here, and here). Award: A massive presence at the 2012 Citizen's Climate Lobby International Conference, July 22 - 24, in Washington D.C.

Ø     The Tulsa World, for showing great courage in defending  climate science and refuting Sen. Jim Inhofe’s claim of "victory in his efforts to debunk man-made global warming as a hoax." Their editorial board’s statement is classic:” While there are scientists and politicians on both sides of the issue, those who see climate change as a genuine threat are mostly scientists and most of those who deny it are politicians.” Award: (Suggestion?)

Ø     The EPA, for standing firm in its efforts to protect the environment in spite of the political pressure it has received. Award: A duplicate of Captain America’s Shield.

Ø     Joe Romm, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, where he writes and maintains Climate Progress , an outstanding source of accurate climate science information. Award: (Suggestion?)

   The poll will close on February 28th.

 

 

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Que2646's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: !► Recommended News ◄!, 112th United States Congress, Climate Change, Climate Change - Human Caused, Climate Dynamics, Election 2012, Green Gadgets & Controls , Green Politics, Heated Debate, Moderate Americans, Newsvine HONOR Vine, Newsvine Science, ObamaVine, OklahomaViners, Palins Pundits, Republican, Republican Progressives, Save Environment Save Wildlife, Science of Climate, Teachers, The Cherokee Lodge, US News and Views , Utilizing Green Energy, Writers
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (10)
Que2646

Thanks to all of you who submitted nominations and for explaining why your candidate deserved an honor. Please vote and tell why - and suggest a suitable gift if you would like. Many of the prizes suggested are quite creative, but you may think of another.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:40 PM EST
Kavika

Good poll Que. Dr. Hansen for his fight against the XL Pipeline if my choice for Hall of Fame. The true story of the pipeline is in direct contradiction to the advertised points. If you research the effect it is having in Canada on natives you'll see this is not something that we want in the U.S.

Hall of Shame. Dr Jane Lubchenco....Doctor!! you have to be kidding. Incompetent should replace the Dr. before her name.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:20 AM EST
Physicist-retired

Que,

Well, you're getting a pretty good response to this poll, as judged by the number of votes. Kudos to you, and everyone who made suggestions. It's also a great idea to spread a little understanding about who is helping/hurting.

I enjoyed the nominations. The Hall of Fame ones are first rate - it was hard to choose, actually. Keep us posted.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:26 PM EST
Que2646

I put the poll on two other websites - but directed them here to vote as it is much easier to set up a poll here. It seems like the Hall of Fame always garners fewer nominations as heroes don't stick out like the villains. At the first of next month, I'll post an article with the winners.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:19 PM EST
Que2646

The winners and losers in the Hall of Fame/Shame poll have been posted today, 03/01/2012 at http://que2646.newsvine.com/_news/2012/03/01/10552807-the-2011-environmental-hall-of-fameshame-winners. Thanks to all who participated.

  • 1 vote
#3.2 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 10:12 PM EST
Reply
McSpocky

Great poll, Que2646! Sorry I didn't get to it sooner. Spreading it around now. :)

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:00 PM EST
bestquest

EPA is totally in the wrong column for two reasons measured here:

1) Clean air. Benzene is released by the ton every night by US steel, Gary works without any interference. Coal to coke. A few miles to the west, a refinery may not release any benzene, period. Same compound, different political.

This false also applies to the 78 hospital burning medical waste without and treatment, permit or monitoring.

2) We lost 5,500 jobs locally and about 22,000 at suppliers. Now add for the trickle down barber shops, restaurants etc. Does EPA have anyone who can calculate a mol? I think not. So, the technology and iron comes in here from Germany. We did it -clean air and then their politically connected advisory board raises the bar and makes the driver turn off the engine when idle. This messes up the catalyst regeneration AND we have to provide clean air with the worst diesel fuel ever found on earth. The 15 parts sulfur that they also specify from the refineries is ignored. I may find really bad fuel at some farm tank that has been idled for a generation.

We do have about 50% of our children here having asthma so I darn well understand the real need for clean air. But we ain't got it and it is not close at hand.

I want the jobs back. I want honest analysis, sampling and I want the uppity hospitals cleaned up. The medicals sure complain a lot. Now, give em a bat and have them take a swing for cleaner air from their own house.

  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:29 PM EST
Que2646

You seem to be suggesting that the EPA is not doing it's job well enough. That's a point well taken, but it seems that Congress is trying its best to see that it doesn't.

The person doing the nominating chooses the category, so I hope you will provide a nomination in next year's poll.

  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:26 PM EST
bestquest

Our viewpoints differ.

I want results, honest air monitoring, honest - real- science, not some california hippie dippie appointed committee member demanding and getting their ever escalating demands. Many are unobtainium and the committees are so set in their tunnel vision that they ignore the really big polluters.

The steel mills are monitored but seemingly exempt from improvement and have big backing by a house committee. Seeing as 11 of 13 here are now foreign owned, what the heck is going on?

The NRC is also criminal in its providing operations continuance to 'Yankee'. So, we have plenty of hot air in DC saying one thing - protecting people - while taking campaign contributions which with a wink and a nod, mean we continue to have grey atmosphere.

Oh, thank you Richard Nixon for the EPA.

    #5.2 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:15 PM EST
    bore-head007

    http://muddog.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/26/10510212-activist-post-world-bank-wants-control-of-the-high-seas

    Carbon and fish = money. Big money.

    Representing EDF/NOAA the always evasive to our Congressional leadership, Lube Job Jane Lubchenco.

    http://www.economistconferences.asia/event/world-oceans-summit

    http://www.economistconferences.asia/event/world-oceans-summit

    Jane Lubchenco, Under-secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Jane Lubchenco has been the under-secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) since 2009.

    http://www.economistconferences.asia/event/world-oceans-summit

    "Doing good while doing well" that's the fund raising slogan of the "free market environmentalists". This is a "Murphy Game" that makes Bernie Madoff's look like tidily winks.

    Fred boasts that he brought the Environmental Defense Fund, from a paltry $3 million to now over $190 million in a mere 9 years---by "partnering with industry". What industries? Well, when St. Krupp was pressed by Charlie Rose during a TV interview he admitted that he favored extended Outer Continental Shelf oil drilling and the burning of "clean" coal---and "greenwashing" corporate monsters like the China Fishery?

    http://dicky-g.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/24/10499648-edf-the-china-fishery-and-the-theft-of-a-vital-resource

    • 1 vote
    #5.3 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:51 PM EST
    Reply
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com